<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GRE Scores and Political Correctness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnmyleswhite.com/notebook/2008/11/08/gre-scores-and-political-correctness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnmyleswhite.com/notebook/2008/11/08/gre-scores-and-political-correctness/</link>
	<description>&#34;He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:17:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Myles White</title>
		<link>http://www.johnmyleswhite.com/notebook/2008/11/08/gre-scores-and-political-correctness/comment-page-1/#comment-17502</link>
		<dc:creator>John Myles White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnmyleswhite.com/?p=3192#comment-17502</guid>
		<description>But of course it&#039;s genius. I routinely assume in my day to day life that the people who score below 1600 on the GRE are incapable of any abstract thought. Really, it&#039;s hard to imagine that a person whose GRE score is below 1400 can even see five inches in front of them, let alone interpret a scatterplot -- plainly the most complex of all graphs.

Putting aside all facetiousness or flippancy, I think finding the proper interpretation of this correlation is just not that simple. It&#039;s especially difficult because looking back now at the quick statistical hack the graph represents makes me wonder even more strongly what it really means: after all, how can one score above 1600 on a test whose top score was 1600 when I took it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But of course it&#8217;s genius. I routinely assume in my day to day life that the people who score below 1600 on the GRE are incapable of any abstract thought. Really, it&#8217;s hard to imagine that a person whose GRE score is below 1400 can even see five inches in front of them, let alone interpret a scatterplot &#8212; plainly the most complex of all graphs.</p>
<p>Putting aside all facetiousness or flippancy, I think finding the proper interpretation of this correlation is just not that simple. It&#8217;s especially difficult because looking back now at the quick statistical hack the graph represents makes me wonder even more strongly what it really means: after all, how can one score above 1600 on a test whose top score was 1600 when I took it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somedude</title>
		<link>http://www.johnmyleswhite.com/notebook/2008/11/08/gre-scores-and-political-correctness/comment-page-1/#comment-17501</link>
		<dc:creator>somedude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnmyleswhite.com/?p=3192#comment-17501</guid>
		<description>&quot;You can figure out the implications of that statement for yourself.&quot;

Clearly a clever ploy to make sure than only people who are not politically correct will be able to figure out what you are getting at.

Politically correct people won&#039;t have the required GRE to interpret all those numbers and data points!

Genius.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You can figure out the implications of that statement for yourself.&#8221;</p>
<p>Clearly a clever ploy to make sure than only people who are not politically correct will be able to figure out what you are getting at.</p>
<p>Politically correct people won&#8217;t have the required GRE to interpret all those numbers and data points!</p>
<p>Genius.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.218 seconds -->

