Science

Criticism 4 of NHST: No Mechanism for Producing Substantive Cumulative Knowledge

[Note to the Reader: This is a much rougher piece than the previous pieces because the argument is more complex. I ask that you please point out places where things are unclear and where claims are not rigorous.] In this fourth part of my series of criticisms of NHST, I’m going to focus on broad […]

Criticism 3 of NHST: Essential Information is Lost When Transforming 2D Data into a 1D Measure

Criticism 3 of NHST: Essential Information is Lost When Transforming 2D Data into a 1D Measure

Introduction Continuing on with my series on the weaknesses of NHST, I’d like to focus on an issue that’s not specific to NHST, but rather one that’s relevant to all quantitative analysis: the destruction caused by an inappropriate reduction of dimensionality. In our case, we’ll be concerned with the loss of essential information caused by […]

Criticism 2 of NHST: NHST Conflates Rare Events with Evidence Against the Null Hypothesis

Introduction This is my second post in a series describing the weaknesses of the NHST paradigm. In the first post, I argued that NHST is a dangerous tool for a community of researchers because p-values cannot be interpreted properly without perfect knowledge of the research practices of other scientists — knowledge that we cannot hope […]

Norvig and the Nature of Modern Science

In this, Chomsky is in complete agreement with O’Reilly. (I recognize that the previous sentence would have an extremely low probability in a probabilistic model trained on a newspaper or TV corpus.)1 Anyone who considers themself an intellectual should be required to read this new essay by Peter Norvig. It’s the best summary I’ve ever […]

Chimpanzee Prostitution?

Chimpanzee prostitution, anyone?